Transnational Transphobias: Feminist and Traditionalist Anti-Gender Affective Orientations

dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T17:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractTransnational anti-trans actors fall into two camps: traditionally conservative actors who pursue transphobia to extend patriarchy and feminists who pursue transphobia to challenge patriarchy. This article investigates how shared language and practices of anti-trans feminist and traditionalist coalitions enact opposing sex/gender orders. I explain this alliance through grounded theory generated from a critical discourse analysis of my dataset of 1016 anti-trans texts from 175 organizations. I develop my Affective Orientation Threat Structure, which explains the affective governing process of this coalition, and then apply this framework to anti-trans discourses about trans threats to womanhood. I find that anti-trans feminists and traditionalists generate fear via shared threat constructions but frame threat differently in order to mobilize affective energy in service of diverging regulative regimes and sex/gender orders. I argue that the illogics produced by contradictions within this incompatible coalition benefit both camps by maximizing affective disorientation and generating momentum through paradox.
dc.identifier.issn1743-923X
dc.identifier.issn1743-9248
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/transnational-transphobias-feminist-and-traditionalist-antigender-affective-orientations/132C855334A85DCDC688C87711D6F013
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdigef.unam.mx/handle/rdigef/2259
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPolitics & Gender
dc.subjectAffect
dc.subjectAnti-gender movement
dc.subjectDiscourse
dc.subjectGender critical
dc.subjectTransgender
dc.subjectTransphobia
dc.titleTransnational Transphobias: Feminist and Traditionalist Anti-Gender Affective Orientations
dc.typeArticle

Files