DIALOGUE: A Generative AI-Based Pre–Post Simulation Study to Enhance Diagnostic Communication in Medical Students Through Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Scenarios

dc.contributor.authorSuárez-García, R.X.
dc.contributor.authorChavez-Castañeda, Q.
dc.contributor.authorOrrico-Pérez, R.
dc.contributor.authorValencia-Marín, S.
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda-Ramírez, A.E.
dc.contributor.authorQuiñones-Lara, E.
dc.contributor.authorRamos-Cortés, C.A.
dc.contributor.authorGaytán-Gómez, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorCortés-Rodríguez, J.
dc.contributor.authorJarquín-Ramírez, J.
dc.contributor.authorAguilar-Marchand, N.G.
dc.contributor.authorValdés-Herná
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-19T19:15:46Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractDIALOGUE (DIagnostic AI Learning through Objective Guided User Experience) is a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-based training program designed to enhance diagnostic communication skills in medical students. In this single-arm pre–post study, we evaluated whether DIALOGUE could improve students’ ability to disclose a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis with clarity, structure, and empathy. Thirty clinical-phase students completed two pre-test virtual encounters with an AI-simulated patient (ChatGPT, GPT-4o), scored by blinded raters using an eight-domain rubric. Participants then engaged in ten asynchronous GenAI scenarios with automated natural-language feedback. Seven days later, they completed two post-test consultations with human standardized patients, again evaluated with the same rubric. Mean total performance increased by 36.7 points (95% CI: 31.4–42.1; p < 0.001), and the proportion of high-performing students rose from 0% to 70%. Gains were significant across all domains, most notably in opening the encounter, closure, and diabetes specific explanation. Multiple regression showed that lower baseline empathy (β = −0.41, p = 0.005) and higher digital self-efficacy (β = 0.35, p = 0.016) independently predicted greater improvement; gender had only a marginal effect. Cluster analysis revealed three learner profiles, with the highest-gain group characterized by low empathy and high digital self-efficacy. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC ≈ 0.90). These findings provide empirical evidence that GenAI-mediated training can meaningfully enhance diagnostic communication and may serve as a scalable, individualized adjunct to conventional medical education.
dc.identifier.issn21748144
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15080152
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdigef.unam.mx/handle/rdigef/687
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEuropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectCommunication training
dc.subjectDiagnostic communication
dc.subjectEmpathy in diagnosis
dc.subjectFormative simulation
dc.subjectGenerative AI
dc.subjectMedical education
dc.subjectStandardized patient
dc.subjectVirtual patient
dc.titleDIALOGUE: A Generative AI-Based Pre–Post Simulation Study to Enhance Diagnostic Communication in Medical Students Through Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Scenarios
dc.typeArticle

Files